Dear Representative, Don’t Sell Out Our Country

Posted by acheslow on Sep 30th, 2008
2008
Sep 30

The following is the latest message that I am sending to my representatives. Thanks to campaignforliberty.com, lewrockwell.com, and mises.org for providing much of this content.


I don’t believe that you can vote in good conscience for any version of a banking bailout if you truly understand the root cause of our current economic problems and the consequences of not allowing a free market to function normally. 166 leading economists, including 3 Nobel Prize winners, agree with me (http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/mortgage_protest.htm).

What’s clear is that a bunch of financial institutions have made mistakes and lost money. What’s unclear is why anyone (other than the owners and managers) should care. People make mistakes and lose money all the time. Restaurants fail, grocery stores fail, gas stations fail. People pick the wrong stocks, they buy the wrong cars, and they marry the wrong spouses without turning to the Treasury for bailouts.

So what’s special about banks? According to what I keep reading, it’s that without banks, nobody can borrow, and the economy grinds to a halt.

Well, let’s think about that. Banks don’t lend their own money; they lend other people’s (their depositors’ and their stockholders’). Just because the banks disappear doesn’t mean the lenders will. Borrowers will still want to borrow and lenders will still want to lend. The only question is whether they’ll be able to find each other.

The Paulson Plan is a heist. It is a grand scheme in which the public will end up owing hundreds of billions of dollars to holders of new debt claims issued by the US Treasury. The plan won’t “prop up” asset values and it won’t provide any real stimulus to the economy.

Despite the dire warnings — coming from the same folks who brought us the Iraq invasion to remove WMD — there is no threat of a financial meltdown. If Goldman Sachs failed, the sun would still rise the next morning.

A better way to fix our economic problems is to allow entrepreneurs the freedom to allocate resources in accordance with society’s priorities. In this sense, the best rescue plan is to allow the market mechanism to operate freely. Allowing the market to do the job will result in some activities disappearing all together while some other activities will in fact be expanded.

This is precisely what a government rescue package will prevent from happening. The government package is not going to rescue the economy, but it will rescue activities that the economy cannot afford and that consumers do not want. It will sustain waste and promote inefficiency, draining resources from growth and efficiency.

Most commentators have accepted that the root problem of the current financial crisis is the lack of proper control over mortgage lending. But the out-of-proportion explosion in the mortgage lending didn’t occur out of the blue. Without the aggressive lowering of interest rates by the Fed, mortgage lending couldn’t have exploded.

The Fed’s loose policies are the crux of the problem. So rather than blaming the symptoms, what is required is to let the market work and close all the loopholes that allow the creation of money and credit out of thin air.

What this country, and your constituents need are the following:

1.) End the Bailouts - Congress must revoke the Federal Reserve’s authority to bail out failed businesses at our expense.

2.) Cut Taxes and Curb Regulation - If we really want to stimulate businesses and revive the market, we need to cut corporate and capital gains taxes, spurring investors to come back to the market and making it easier to attract new workers and clients.  It is also time to end failed legislation like Sarbanes-Oxley, which has crippled capital markets, diminished our competitiveness, and greatly harmed small businesses.

3.) Reduce Spending - We must freeze all non-entitlement spending by the federal government at current levels and eliminate wasteful spending both domestically and in our trillion-dollar overseas budget.  Our debt has to come down, and it won’t until we start living within our means.

4.) Reform the Monetary System - If we are to have long-term economic progress, we must end the system of printing money out of thin air. The current laws limiting the circulation of gold and silver-backed currency must be overturned.  We can no longer base our money on the empty promises of bureaucrats that it is sound.

The market will have to adjust, and the nation will have to deal with the effects of what the government has brought upon us, but the answer is not to weaken the dollar, continue to sell our debt and national security to China and Saudi Arabia, and socialize what remains of the American free market.

Who’s Who Behind The Economic Collapse

Posted by acheslow on Sep 25th, 2008
2008
Sep 25

Out of curiousity, I started playing with a concept mapping tool tonight and began plotting the corporate and political relationships between the players behind the recent economic collapse.

You can view the full map here.

Some interesting connections:

  • Henry M. Paulson, the Secretary of the Treasury is the former CEO of Goldman Sachs
  • Geoffrey T. Boisi was a Senior General Partner at Goldman Sachs and is a member of the board of Freddie Mac
  • James A. Johnson is a member of the board of Goldman Sachs and was the CEO of Fannie Mae and Managing Director of Lehman Brothers
  • Robert Zoellick, the President of the World Bank, was both a Vice Chairman for Goldman Sachs and an Executive Vice President of Fannie Mae
  • Stephen Friedman was both a General Partner at Goldman Sachs and a member of the board of Fannie Mae
  • Ben Bernanke (Chairman of the Federal Reserve), Gary L. Seevers (VP and Partner of Goldman Sachs), and Martin Feldstein (Board member of AIG) all served as Chairman of the US Council of Economic Advisers.
  • Anastasia D. Kelly served as both VP of Fannie Mae and General Counsel of AIG

That’s some club, huh? And this doesn’t even count the multitude of other connections that arise when you include organizations like the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and Group of 30.

My Prediction

Posted by acheslow on Sep 23rd, 2008
2008
Sep 23

Because of 9/11 the government restricted our freedom from unreasonable searches, our right to a speedy and public trial, our freedom of association, our right to legal representation, our freedom of speech, and our right to liberty.

Because of the economic collapse the government will further restrict the free market and our economic freedoms.

I predict that next the Internet will be either the target or a major component of a national catastrophe, resulting in new government regulations that severely restrict our access to information on the Internet.

I hope I’m wrong.

Please - vote NO to the Paulson/Bernankee bailout that will redistribute hundreds of billions, if not trillions, of dollars out of the hands of honest Americans and grant the federal government massive new powers to control and manipulate markets.

A Rasmussen Poll puts the support for the bailout at 7%! For any legislator to vote yes on this plan is to spit in the face of his constituents and reveal his utter contempt for the democratic process and the voice of the people. To do so would require him to utterly disavow the Constitution that he swore by oath to uphold.

It can be tolerated no more.

America became the greatest, most prosperous nation in history through low taxes, constitutionally-limited government, personal freedom, and a belief in sound money. The way out of this current financial crisis is to return to those timeless principles:
1.) End the Bailouts - The Federal Reserve’s authority to use taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street must be revoked and the Fed must be held accountable.
2.) Stop Congress’ Reckless Spending - We must freeze all non-entitlement spending by the federal government at current levels and eliminate wasteful spending both domestically and in our trillion-dollar overseas budget.
3.) Cut Taxes - If Wall Street can be given our tax dollars, shouldn’t we get some back? It’s time to cut taxes and return our money to us. Combined with spending reform, this will increase the purchasing power of our dollars and help lessen the economic storm.
4.) Reform the Monetary System - If we are to have long-term economic progress, we must end the system of printing money out of thin air. The current laws limiting the circulation of gold and silver-backed currency must be overturned.

Thank you,
Alan Cheslow

How Does Washington State Count Write-In Votes?

Posted by acheslow on Sep 15th, 2008
2008
Sep 15

Ever since Ron Paul advised his fans to vote against the status-quo duopoly, there has been a bit of FUD (or at least, uncertainty) going around about how states count write-in votes. Sandra Hamilton contributed a good article about why she will be voting not just against the Republicrats, but for Ron Paul as a write-in candidate. However, she cautions that each state handles write-in votes differently, and links to the requirements for write-in candidates in each state.

In Washington state, a write-in candidate must file a notarized “Declaration of Write-in Candidacy”. Unfortunately, anyone who ran in the state primary election is excluded from declaring their write-in candidacy for the general election, thus Ron Paul cannot be recognized as an official write-in candidate. Rather than trying to guess or assume what my state will really do with a write-in vote for Ron Paul, I asked the Office of the Secretary of State. Here is their response:

Good morning Alan,

Thank you for contacting the Secretary of State Elections Division.  You
will be credited for voting and it will be reflected in the grand total
of overall votes however votes for each individual candidate will not be
tallied unless they equal at least one percent of the vote.

I hope this information is helpful.  Should you have any other questions
please feel free to contact me at your convenience.

Best regards,
Christina Rhoads
Office of the Secretary of State
Elections Division
PO Box 40229
Olympia, WA 98504-0029
(360) 902-4180
crhoads@secstate.wa.gov
www.vote.wa.gov

Look to this day, for it is Life, the very life of Life;
In its brief course lie all the verities and realities of your
existence…
the bliss of Growth, the glory of Action, the splendour of Beauty.

—–Original Message—–
From:
Alan Cheslow
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 10:05 PM
To: Elections
Subject: Write-in vote?

Hi, I understand that a person who desires to be a write-in candidate
must file a notarized “Declaration of Write-in Candidacy”.

How will my vote (for President) be counted if I vote for a person who
has not submitted this declaration? Will it at least be included in
the total number of votes cast, or will it be completely nullified?

Thanks,

Alan Cheslow

I can live with the limitation that my vote may not be counted specifically as a vote for Ron Paul as long as I have voted my conscience, and I know that my vote will be counted — or at least, legally should be counted. I know that some fear that their write-in votes for Ron Paul will be illegally discarded, but I will not let that fear prevent me from voting my conscience.

Update: I’ve also contacted the Seattle PI, KOMO 4 News, KIRO TV, and KING5 News asking them to research the response from the Elections Division and confirm whether or not this response is accurate. I’ll update this post if/when I hear back from any of them.

Update #2: I haven’t heard back from any of the press, but I did send a clarifying question to the Elections Division and they promptly responded with the following:

Alan,
 
1)     If you do not file a declaration of candidacy a voter must write your name in exactly as it appears on your voter registration.  If you file as a write in any variation of your name is accepted as long as voter intent is clear.
 
2)     If the overall write-in vote tally (every write-in vote) equals at least1% of the votes, individual write-in votes (each individual candidate) will be tallied. 
 
I’m not sure if I made this any clearer, it’s a tricky subject.  The bottom line with tallying write-in votes is that a clear impact needs to be made in order to tally them.  Individual write-in votes would take a lot of time and effort to tally without making any impact on the outcome of the race, hence the requirement for the 1%.
 
I hope this is helpful.
 
All the best,
Christina Rhoads
Office of the Secretary of State
Elections Division
PO Box 40229
Olympia, WA 98504-0029
(360) 902-4180
crhoads@secstate.wa.gov
www.vote.wa.gov
 
Look to this day, for it is Life, the very life of Life;
In its brief course lie all the verities and realities of your existence…
the bliss of Growth, the glory of Action, the splendour of Beauty.

—–Original Message—–
From: Alan Cheslow
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:18 PM
To: Elections
Subject: Re: Write-in vote?

 
Hello, and thank for your prompt response.
 
Can you please help clarify two points?
 
1) If votes for a write-in candidate who has not filed a “Declaration of Write-In Candidacy” are still counted, then what is the purpose of this declaration, and how are persons who have submitted this declaration handled differently from persons who have not submitted this declaration?
 
2) If you do not tally votes for individual candidates then how will you know whether or not they equal at least 1% of the vote?
 
Thanks again,
Alan Cheslow

2007
Aug 6

Bad Health Care, Deficient Welfare Keep Americans Short

Posted by acheslow on May 23rd, 2007
2007
May 23

Europeans Taller on Average: Bad Health Care, Deficient Welfare Keep Americans Short - International - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News
US citizens were among the tallest in the world up until World War II. But since then, heights have stagnated while Europeans have been getting taller and taller, with the average American now between two and six centimeters shorter. A new study, which involved the statistical analysis of demographic and health data collected between 1959 and 2002, concludes that the spotty US health-care system and weak welfare net could explain why Americans have stopped growing.

YouTube - Ron Paul Courageously Speaks the Truth

Posted by acheslow on May 21st, 2007
2007
May 21

YouTube - Ron Paul Courageously Speaks the Truth
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7d_e9lrcZ8]
Congressman Ron Paul in the GOP presidential debate held in South Carolina May 07.

Ron Paul in Debate at Reagan Library (May ‘07)

Posted by acheslow on May 5th, 2007
2007
May 5

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peBGJwE9NXo]

Fascist America, in 10 easy steps

Posted by acheslow on Apr 24th, 2007
2007
Apr 24

Also found thru BoingBoing:

If you look at history, you can see that there is essentially a blueprint for turning an open society into a dictatorship. That blueprint has been used again and again in more and less bloody, more and less terrifying ways. But it is always effective. It is very difficult and arduous to create and sustain a democracy - but history shows that closing one down is much simpler. You simply have to be willing to take the 10 steps.

As difficult as this is to contemplate, it is clear, if you are willing to look, that each of these 10 steps has already been initiated today in the United States by the Bush administration.

Full article here.

Next »